Night of the Living Dead (1990)

NIGHT-OF-THE-LIVING-DEAD-1990-posterA couple of times recently I’ve talked about remakes of classic horror movies. Sometimes they work, and sometimes they don’t. I maintain that in order for a remake to be a critical success, it has to have a point. It might be that the original fell short in some way, or that film-making technology has advanced sufficiently to benefit the telling of a particular story. Or maybe a sociological, environmental or political change or similar has given the premise a new lease of life.

Unfortunately, the George Romero scripted, Tom Savini directed 1990 remake of Romero’s classic NIGHT OF THE LIVING DEAD has very little reason to exist. I caught the remake on it’s opening weekend twenty-five years ago (twenty-five years… how did that happen?) and I took the opportunity to watch it again recently. I really enjoyed it when I was twenty, and I wondered how it would hold up today. The short answer – it didn’t. Not particularly well, anyway.

It’s a new night for terror – and a new dawn in horror movie-making when special-effects genius Tom Savini (creator of the spectacularly gruesome make-up in FRIDAY THE 13TH and CREEPSHOW) brings modern technology to this colourful remake of George A. Romero‘s 1968 cult classic. Seven strangers are trapped in an isolated farmhouse while cannibalistic zombies – awakened from death by the return of a radioactive space probe – wage a relentless attack, killing (and eating) everyone in their path. The classic for the 90s: graphic, gruesome and more terrifying than ever!

I have to admit, I was really disappointed with my recent re-watch of the NIGHT OF THE LIVING DEAD remake. It’s taken me a few weeks to work out exactly why, and I think there are a number of reasons.

There’s still quite a bit to like here. Some good gore and make-up effects, strong performances by most of the cast (particularly Patricia Tallman), decent photography… Unfortunately, for me the bad outweighs the good by a long margin. With the benefit of hindsight, this movie feels to me like the beginning of Romero’s decline. LAND OF THE DEAD apart (another film on my list to re-watch and write about), his more recent zombie movies pale into insignificance against the original NIGHT, DAWN and DAY. I don’t know if you’ve seen them? DIARY OF THE DEAD was pretty awful, and SURVIVAL OF THE DEAD was one of the worst films I’ve ever seen.

Like I said, the remake of NIGHT seems to set this descent into motion. For me, it’s where Romero stopped innovating and started mimicking – where his movies stopped setting the rules and raising the bar, and instead just followed the crowd like a lone zombie at the back of a pack of other featureless undead buggers.

This suggestion is borne out by the fact that, for the most part, this film spends its running time mimicking the original: beat for beat, moment for moment. But then, as if to check we’re still paying attention, it’ll make a subtle and often unnecessary change. Slight spoilers ahead. What looks like the first ghoul in the replay of the cemetery scene, isn’t. Barbara has a character arc which is almost diametrically opposite of the whiney, mouse-like woman from the original. And most regrettably, Ben is denied the perfect ending the character faced in the 1968 movie. That said, Tony Todd, the 1990 Ben, is such a strong screen presence that he’s watchable pretty much whatever he’s doing.

notld1990

But do you see where I’m going here? These are just changes made for changes sake. It’s like Romero needed reasons for people to watch this remake and so set traps. In retrospect it feels cheap. It leaves a bad taste.

The timeless quality of the 1968 original is lost here, and is replaced by a full-on 1990’s vibe, a point driven home by the godawful electronic soundtrack which destroys any atmosphere the moment it starts playing.

I feel like I’m being unfair here, because this movie isn’t a total write-off. It has a lot going for it, but falls at the first hurdle because it’s a remake of a film which didn’t need to be remade. Please do check it out though if you haven’t already. It’s available on DVD and VOD from all the usual outlets including Amazon and iTunes.

But if you’ve got an hour and a half and are in the mood for a truly ground-breaking zombie movie, watch this instead:

Bookmark the permalink.
  • Alan Wordley

    Tom savini nailed it for me, good to see a heroine not scream every 5 seconds, Tony todd was superb as well.

  • VinceMH

    davidjmoody I didn’t think it was THAT bad… and also: Pat Tallman – mmmmm. It gets bonus points for her alone. :)

  • VinceMH

    davidjmoody btw:Finally(!) got around to reading Them or Us for the first time. Excellent end to the trilogy (subject to the coming news?)

  • JamesE.Parsons

    It lingered in my mind after the first time I saw it when I was a teenager. Had to see it again, and yes strong vivid effects, direction and lead actor.

  • davidjmoody

    VinceMH I’m with you on that! I really liked the remake… until I watched it again. Great to hear you enjoyed Them or Us, by the way!

  • John Clark

    One to catch in the near future is ” extinction”, nice take on the whole post apocalypse thing, 9 years after Z day, and the state of things in the aftermath. Not a lot of crazy action, but a good watch none the less.

  • Patient Lecter

    Best remake ever way before remakes became common and irritating.

  • Volker Schoenenberger

    Remakes were common very much earlier – decades earlier.

  • Volker Schoenenberger

    Nice review and a good reason for watching it again myself (and reviewing it for my zombies column: https://dienachtderlebendentexte.wordpress.com/zombies/ ). 25 years ago – hell of a long time. Seen it in the cinema that year. Bought a vhs years later (which I never watched) and have the dvd for some years now. Never watched that one, either, so now is the time.